Skip to main content

Dissecting a lesson: speaking

This is a short extract from my new book Becoming an Outstanding Languages Teacher. The book, primarily aimed at new or newish language teachers, features a number of examples of detailed descriptions of interactions between the teacher and students. These are effectively blow-by-blow accounts of how you might run specific lessons - what the teacher might say, what the pupils might say. Each of these descriptions is accompanied by a running commentary of tips.

This particular example is from the chapter on developing speaking lessons. It is aimed at intermediate students and uses a text about Cinderella as the stimulus.

First, here is the text (you would translate it into your chosen language):



Cinderella

There was once a beautiful girl, an orphan, who lived in a big house with her father. Her stepmother had two daughters who were ugly and unkind. The stepmother and the two sisters forced Cinderella to do all the housework every day. She had to do the laundry, wash the dishes, do the ironing and prepare all the meals. Each day she also had to remove the ashes from the fireplace. This is why she was called Cinderella.
One day the prince of the kingdom organized a ball because he wanted to find a bride. All the girls in the realm were invited. Cinderella’s two step-sisters, helped by their mother, made all the preparations for the ball. Cinderella was not allowed to go to the ball. She was sad not to be going but did not dare ask permission to go. She cried so much that her fairy godmother heard her and suddenly appeared. The fairy used her magic to turn Cinderella into a beautiful woman. She created an amazing dress, slippers made of glass and a coach and horses.
So Cinderella could go to the ball, but she had to promise to return before midnight. When she arrived at the ball everyone was amazed by her beauty. The prince invited her to dance. At the end of the evening she was so happy that she forgot the time. In her haste, she lost a glass slipper. The prince was determined to find his loved one, so he went to visit all the girls in the kingdom and asked them to try on the slipper. He promised to marry the girl who was able to wear the shoe.

When he arrived at Cinderella’s house, the step-sisters tried on the slipper, but it didn’t fit. Then he asked Cinderella to try on the slipper. The prince was amazed to discover that poor Cinderella was the girl he had met.They soon married and lived happily ever after.




Next, here is how you might build the lesson to get students to talk. Note how this is also a multi-skill lesson featuring plenty of listening and reading too. Each skill reinforces the other.




Teacher
Students
Commentary
Pre-reading: display some key words on the board (prince, king, shoe, glass, housework, step-sister, ball, coach and horses). Ask students to guess what they are going to be working on.
Students listen and then work out what they are going to be talking about. Easy!
This immediately raises interest and provides some key vocabulary which students will hear, read and use later. Any unfamiliar words which are not clear cognates (depending on the language) can be explained by definition, gesture or translation.

Display and/or hand out the story to be read. Read it to them.
Students follow the text. A class with poor literacy might be asked to follow with a ruler beneath each line.

Scan the class now and again to check students are following.
Ask students to read aloud short sections of the text. Make any corrections to pronunciation. Make sure any reader repeats a mispronounced word. Correct sympathetically
Hands up or no hands up for this. Individuals read short sections.
You could use whole group reading aloud if the class is well trained in this. This keeps everyone involved. You could use this opportunity to focus on intonation, an often neglected area in language lessons. Teach the class any patterns you know, e.g. the rising intonation and slight phrase-end stress in French.

Make false statements for the class to correct. You can make these as silly as you want to hold interest: The fairy godmother created a Ferrari.
Hands up, with occasional teacher choice of student. Students can essentially re-read sections of text to do this activity.
At times like this you need to be really vigilant about who is listening carefully. Use eye contact, choose any student who appears to be inattentive. Keep the whole class on the ball.

Now tell the class you’re going to give them true/false/not mentioned statements. You can make these as subtle or as outrageous as you want, depending on the class.

Hands up or no hands up.
This tests your skill at judging precisely what you think the class can do. Pitching this sort of task accurately is vital.
Ask TL questions on the text.
Hands up or no hands up.
This demands more from the class as they have to decode the question, then use a different structure to answer. Even so, they can still lift from the text. Note how much recycling of language is already taking place.

Get students into pairs. Tell them that each partner has to make up true/false/not mentioned statements of their own. Give a time limit to add a sense of urgency.

Students work in pairs alternately testing their partner.
By now there has been enough input for students to talk, but they’ll still be lifting from the text to a large degree.
Tell students to hide their text or just hide your displayed text. Get students, in pairs, to make as many statements as they can about the story in TL. Tell them that the first partner who can’t say something is the loser. Tell them not to worry about making mistakes.

Students make up statements from memory. Some will no doubt improvise a bit at this point.
Monitor the pair work carefully. Accept hardly any chatting in English. Warn them specifically about this if necessary.
If the class still has enough energy, tell them each partner has to try to tell the story to the other. The partner must listen and make any corrections as they see fit.

More pair work. Students produce longer stretches of speech, mixing remembered language and improvising a bit more.
If this part is beyond your class, you can provide a gapped summary on the board for students to refer to. Make this as easy or as hard as it needs to be. You’ll know in advance what your class’s capabilities are likely to be.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

La retraite à 60 ans

Suite à mon post récent sur les acquis sociaux..... L'âge légal de la retraite est une chose. Je voudrais bien savoir à quel âge les gens prennent leur retraite en pratique - l'âge réel de la retraite, si vous voulez. J'ai entendu prétendre qu'il y a peu de différence à cet égard entre la France et le Royaume-Uni. Manifestation à Marseille en 2008 pour le maintien de la retraite à 60 ans © AFP/Michel Gangne Six Français sur dix sont d’accord avec le PS qui défend la retraite à 60 ans (BVA) Cécile Quéguiner Plus de la moitié des Français jugent que le gouvernement a " tort de vouloir aller vite dans la réforme " et estiment que le PS a " raison de défendre l’âge légal de départ en retraite à 60 ans ". Résultat d’un sondage BVA/Absoluce pour Les Échos et France Info , paru ce matin. Une majorité de Français (58%) estiment que la position du Parti socialiste , qui défend le maintien de l’âge légal de départ à la retraite à 60 ans,