Skip to main content

Review: Cambridge IGCSE and O level French as a Foreign language



Written by Danièle Bourdais and Geneviève Talon, this brand new coursebook and accompanying CDs are for pupils studying for IGCSE and O level. It's a thickish, colourful and clearly laid out 12 unit pupil book of nearly 200 pages. The book looks suitable for good Year 10 and 11 pupils.

Unit titles are: mon quotidien, La pleine forme, Une famille à l'étranger, Faites la fête!, Ma ville, demain, La nature - amie, ennemie ou victime, Bonjour de Francophonie, L'école et après, Au travail!, A l'écoute du monde, En voyage and Jeune au XXIe siècle. There are revision units built in to the course after every two units. The coursebook should be bought in conjunction with the Workbook if you want plenty of back-up vocabulary, grammar and strategies support. These workbooks are usually well worth getting.

When I look at a unit in detail, e.g. Faites la fête, I see it contains a good range of activity types: imaginative questions, comprehension matching, task-based activities such as drawing up lists for a celebration and traditional short texts with key grammar embedded, e.g. future tense verbs, quand + future + future. The latter leave plenty of scope for exploitation with question-answer and other interactions.



There are group and pair activities, grammar drills (e.g. changing infinitives to future tense), cultural information, boxes with brief grammar notes, gap-fill listening and reading comprehension tasks (grids to complete, matching names to paragraphs etc).

There is one longer text about the positive and negative consequences of a festival on a locality. This is followed by a range of exercise types: matching, TL questions (only three - I like to see more but space is limited in text books), identifying opinions and how they are expressed, grammar analysis (finding verbs in different tenses), finding time expressions, note-taking from listening texts and oral work to get pupils to use complex si clauses.

The grammar section for the unit is written all in French. This may confuse some pupils, but the target students tend to be at the able end of the spectrum and may be able to handle this. Teachers may choose to do their own explanations in English and add plenty of supplementary grammar drills.

Whenever I look at a book my main question is: could I use this in class? Overall, this unit, even if you don't go for every single exercise, looks very usable and quite interesting for its target clientele. (I always think this topic is a tricky one to approach since it is relatively hard to personalise it compared to some others.) The implied methodology is the common hybrid of communicative + comprehensible input + explicit grammar and drills so is in the sensible mainstream. The source texts look to be adapted authentic.

Just a word about the revision sections in the book. I like how these build in an element of spaced learning. They include lots of model questions and answers for exam practice, extra reading and games.

As far as the listening material on the CDs is concerned, it's definitely in the "clear and slowed down" camp, which is fine by me. Some would argue that it should be more authentic and natural to prepare students for real life speech. If anything, there may be a slight disconnect with the difficulty level of the written material and easier listening. I hesitate to be too judgemental about this, however, especially as I have never taught this specific course.

Danièle and Geneviève should be congratulated for putting together such a comprehensive, well thought-out and varied book which I daresay is well matched to its exam specification. I am full of admiration for teacher-writers who spend so much time producing resources for relatively little reward. It's a mammoth task.












Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

La retraite à 60 ans

Suite à mon post récent sur les acquis sociaux..... L'âge légal de la retraite est une chose. Je voudrais bien savoir à quel âge les gens prennent leur retraite en pratique - l'âge réel de la retraite, si vous voulez. J'ai entendu prétendre qu'il y a peu de différence à cet égard entre la France et le Royaume-Uni. Manifestation à Marseille en 2008 pour le maintien de la retraite à 60 ans © AFP/Michel Gangne Six Français sur dix sont d’accord avec le PS qui défend la retraite à 60 ans (BVA) Cécile Quéguiner Plus de la moitié des Français jugent que le gouvernement a " tort de vouloir aller vite dans la réforme " et estiment que le PS a " raison de défendre l’âge légal de départ en retraite à 60 ans ". Résultat d’un sondage BVA/Absoluce pour Les Échos et France Info , paru ce matin. Une majorité de Français (58%) estiment que la position du Parti socialiste , qui défend le maintien de l’âge légal de départ à la retraite à 60 ans,