Skip to main content

The tech package language teachers need

Computers and other new technology have been tremendous for languages. Ever since the reel-to-reel tape recorder and slide projector language teachers have led the way in schools in the use of the latest technology to enhance the quality of lessons. Language laboratories, cassettes, television, VCRs, CDs, interactive boards, mobile devices and networked computers have all provided us with new tools to make lessons more accessible and interesting. Some have even created new approaches to language learning in their own right.

And yet... we still await the total package which would fulfill all our needs.

For presentation, enhanced powerpoints (e.g. Boardworks) are good. For advanced grammar explanation we have Le Français Interactif. For grammar practice, interactive web sites such as languagesonline do the job. For interactive listening we have the likes of the Ashcombe School video quizzes, the BBC, Audio Lingua and a wide range of online and published resources. For comprehension we can dip into online sources such as MYLO, PolarFLE. For vocabulary learning there's Vocab Express. For games there's Taskmagic. For language in context and cultural content we have the BBC. For assessment we have Exampro. At the more gimmicky end of things we have the likes of Voki and Goanimate.

What we do not yet have is a teaching package which can combine everything we would like in a stimulating and challenging way for students.

Such a package would allow teachers to present and practise material and for students to work independently with instant feedback and without distracting each other. These could be some of the elements:

  • Presentational material e.g. flashcard/powerpoint
  • Interactive textual material
  • Interactive listening material (mainly video)
  • Interactive grammar practice
  • Teacher and self-assessment resources
  • Interactive games
  • Voice recording and feedback capability
  • Intercultural content
Now, there have been attempts to do something along these lines, for example the AQA Nelson-Thornes Kerboodle packages (the clue is in the title), but they have been, to my mind at least, unimaginative (dull interface, short of creative tasks, boring texts), short on investment (e.g. lack of video, lack of games, patchy exercises) and not cheap for language departments strapped for cash.

The problem may be partly one of imagination, but the real issue is money. The market for a total package of this type is relatively small, since the product would need to cater for specific syllabuses and would probably not cross continents. The investment would need to be large, so the cost would be prohibitive. It would take the likes of the BBC to be able to produce something with the scale and quality required. Their Learning Zone Class Clips gives an idea of what can be achieved with an existing archive of material. But look out for Pearson who, drawing on their American experience, will look for lucrative opportunities to make the most of the English market for ready-made teaching and testing resources.

PS - Anneli Mclachlan has pointed out Pearson's ActiveTeach to me. Is it good?

Comments

  1. Nice blog entry, and great to have the links too.

    I can also recommend ActiveTeach. It is a digital copy of the textbooks (both higher and foundation). You can expand each section of a page (great for annotating) and access all the resources to go with the double spread so no more hunting around for CDS or finding the transcript in the teacher's guide.

    For each chapter, there is also a video embedded into one of the pages, again with a transcript and worksheet tasks.

    I really like it as a tool, and it does bring the book alive :-)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

The 2026 GCSE subject content is published!

Two DfE documents were published today. The first was the response to the consultation about the proposed new GCSE (originally due in October 2021) and the second is the subject content document which, ultimately, is of most interest to MFL teachers in England. Here is the link  to the document.  We are talking about an exam to be done from 2026 (current Y7s). There is always a tendency for sceptical teachers to think that consultations are a bit of a sham and that the DfE will just go ahead and do what they want when it comes to exam reform. In this case, the responses to the original proposals were mixed, and most certainly hostile as far as exam boards and professional associations representing the MFL community, universities, head teachers and awarding bodies are concerned. What has emerged does reveal some significant changes which take account of a number of criticisms levelled at the proposals. As I read it, the most important changes relate to vocabulary and the issue of topics