Skip to main content

William et Kate vont se marier

Je dois avouer que je ne suis pas royaliste. Je trouve anachronique notre monarchie qui n'a rien à voir avec une démocratie moderne. Cela dit, William et Kate semblent être un couple heureux et tout le monde espère qu'ils auront un mariage réussi. Mais le plus important, c'est que leurs noces nous donneront un jour de congé supplémentaire en 2011!

Voici le reportage de la nouvelle sur yahoo.fr:

"Le prince William, deuxième dans l'ordre de succession au trône d'Angleterre, épousera sa fiancée Kate Middleton, une roturière, le 29 avril prochain à l'abbaye de Westminster, à Londres. 

Cette annonce, dans le sillage de celle de leurs fiançailles tant attendues, met fin au suspense sur le lieu de la cérémonie - la cathédrale Saint-Paul, au coeur de la City, comme ce fut le cas en 1981 pour les parents de William, le prince Charles et feu la princesse Diana, ou bien Westminster.
"Nous savons que le monde aura les yeux rivés sur Londres le 29 avril et le couple est très, très attaché à ce que la cérémonie de mariage soit l'exemple classique de ce que notre pays sait faire de mieux", a expliqué mardi Jamie Lowther-Pinkerton, secrétaire particulier de William.
Il a précisé que les frais de la cérémonie religieuse, de la réception et du voyage de noces seraient acquittés par les deux familles.
Pour des économistes, le mariage de William et Kate, dans un climat économique morose, devrait donner un coup de fouet d'une valeur d'un milliard de dollars à l'économie britannique grâce à la venue de touristes et à la vente d'objets-souvenirs.
L'abbaye de Westminster est le lieu traditionnel du couronnement des monarques anglais depuis Guillaume le Conquérant en l'an 1066.
La souveraine actuelle et grand-mère de William, la reine Elizabeth II, s'y est mariée en 1947 et c'est là que s'est tenu le service funèbre à la mémoire de Diana après sa mort tragique en 1997 dans un accident de la circulation à Paris.
Le gouvernement britannique a confirmé que le 29 avril, qui tombe un vendredi, serait un jour férié, assurant aux Britanniques un long week-end du 1er mai."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

12 principles of second language teaching

This is a short, adapted extract from our book The Language Teacher Toolkit . "We could not possibly recommend a single overall method for second language teaching, but the growing body of research we now have points to certain provisional broad principles which might guide teachers. Canadian professors Patsy Lightbown and Nina Spada (2013), after reviewing a number of studies over the years to see whether it is better to just use meaning-based approaches or to include elements of explicit grammar teaching and practice, conclude: Classroom data from a number of studies offer support for the view that form-focused instruction and corrective feedback provided within the context of communicative and content-based programmes are more effective in promoting second language learning than programmes that are limited to a virtually exclusive emphasis on comprehension. As teachers Gianfranco and I would go along with that general view and would like to suggest our own set of g